UMAP plots (B, E) are highly manipulable and clustering/placement does not necessarily reflect objective measures.
Unpleasant colour choices in (C); there is room for aesthetic improvement.
The proportion plot in (C) does not give information on absolute number, only proportion; a proportional areas plot spanning all clusters would more honestly represent the data.
Heatmap text is too small to read comfortably; is there too much data here?
Larger figures/graphs, more space between figures/graphs
Too much data per figure
Split into multiple figures
Remove unnecessary data (how do we define this?)
“The data is presented in a manner that would likely be inaccessible for people without prior experience. A move toward a more palatable/digestible format will facilitate better science communication in the future.”
Visualising Data About Data Visualisation
What did you say about figure effectiveness?
Visualising Data About Data Visualisation
What words did you use to describe figure improvements?